Earth Science Today
Russ Colson
Minnesota State University Moorhead

Weather and Climate:

Topic 2: Climate, ice ages, and global warming

      Big stories of weather are always in the news: It’s drier than it used to be, it’s wetter, storms are bigger, floods are more severe or more frequent. I first moved to Minnesota at the end of several very dry years. I heard how the dry weather was probably due to global warming. For the next 5 years, the average snowfall in winter, and precipitation in general, far exceeded long term averages, sometimes by a factor of 2 or 3 or even 4 (they were pretty rough winters for someone from farther south newly dipping his toe into the icy waters of a real winter!).    The increased precipitation raised ground water levels in the entire region, burying roads under lakes, and sometimes threatening houses. Clearly (so I heard), it was wetter than normal due to global warming.

     Weather is usually extraordinary. It is never quite like the average. People are regularly commenting, “Climate must be changing, because the weather’s not like it used to be”.

     But which weather variation constitutes a climate change and which variation is just a normal blip in a long-term pattern?  Our recorded weather data goes back one to two hundred years, and our anecdotal stories of weather back a ways farther.  But what does a climate change that spans tens of thousands of years look like and how could we recognize it in Earth’s storybook?

     Climate does change. In West Virginia and Kentucky, pollen from bogs indicates climate was cooler there in the past than it is now. Sediments in the northern tier of states like Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania bear witness to the mile thick glaciers that used to be there. The geologic record of weather for the past 100,000 years or so is fossilized in the ice of the polar glaciers. Layer upon layer, Greenland’s winter snows cover the summer’s dust and form a variegated stratigraphy in the ice that bears the global climate’s signature. Greenland ice core data indicate that over the past 100,000 years, average yearly temperatures have varied by 9 to 18°F from the modern average.

 Climate differs from weather in that it refers to a long-term average of weather conditions. In thinking of climate, one does not only consider average temperature or precipitation for a region, but the average variations in temperature and precipitation with season. Thus the climate of San Francisco, with an average annual temperature of about 56.5°F is very different from St. Louis with an average annual temperature of 56.2°F. In San Francisco, the average monthly temperature varies from about 60°F in summer to 50°F in winter. In St. Louis, average monthly temperatures in summer approach 80°F and winter monthly temperatures are 32°F. In addition, average yearly temperatures in St. Louis vary from 47 to 65°F degrees. Those in San Francisco vary only from 50 to 63°F. The lower variation in temperature from summer to winter, and from year to year, in San Francisco is due to the moderating influence of the nearby Pacific Ocean. Thus, climate is affected not only by latitude, but by presence of oceans or other bodies of water, mountain ranges, and many other geographical factors.

 Precipitation also can change with season. Some places have precipitation distributed more or less evenly throughout the year. Other places get most of their precipitation in summer or winter. Some places get lots of rain, others places are extremely dry. (illustration of precipitation and temperature patterns for some selected locations). (Climate zone map, credit: modified from Strahler and Strahler, Introducing Physical Geology.)

 This combination of patterns of temperature and precipitation (and other weather variables as well), constitutes what we call climate.

(Note: the averages reported here are for the years 1936-1975)

 

 We can understand the big picture of climate by considering the balance of heat coming into and leaving Earth. Because the Earth is neither catastrophically heating up or cooling off, we can infer that, to a very good first approximation, the amount of energy arriving from the Sun is very nearly equal to the energy leaving Earth for space. There are lots of things that can happen to that energy from the Sun as it interacts with Earth. As a thought exercise, try to construct a flow-diagram of the movement of energy from the time it approaches Earth from the Sun until it leaves. Think about the big picture or what can happen to that energy. Consider both the surface of the Earth, and the atmosphere of the Earth as two different places with which the energy can interact. (hints)

Example flow-diagram of energy movement on Earth.

 Absorption of energy in the atmosphere does not occur equally in all places (ice at the poles reflects more, black dirt on a tilled field absorbs more). It does not always occur at the same elevations (cloudy areas might reflect more light before it reaches the surface). It does not occur equally with latitude or with season (As we talked about in the section on the Earth’s seasons). In addition, different wavelengths of energy from the Sun will be reflected or absorbed in different ways and in different places. In fact, some wavelengths are absorbed in Earth’s atmosphere while other wavelengths pass through. This can be understood in concept by playing with a red laser (like are used as pointers) and different colored filters. Put a yellow and red filter together and the laser shines through them almost undiminished in brightness. Put a green and blue filter together and the red laser beam is mostly completely absorbed in the filters. Likewise, some wavelengths of light are absorbed in our atmosphere and some are not. (Do you know one part of the electromagnetic spectrum that is not absorbed much by our atmosphere? Answer: Yes, of course you do. But what is it? Answer).

 The differential absorption of energy at different levels in our atmosphere is what produces the structure of our atmosphere. Our atmosphere is divided into different layers according to how the temperature of the layer changes as one goes upward. Differences in how the temperature changes is related to absorption of energy in different layers and to temperature changes due to adiabatic “cooling” which we talked about in the section on winds and rain. (illustration of structure of Earth’s atmosphere with absorption in different levels).  Note: The absorption of ultraviolet radiation in the stratosphere is by ozone. This is why the ozone hole is of concern to us, since the ozone in the stratosphere protects life on Earth’s surface from this radiation.

 Differential absorption of different wavelengths of energy by our atmosphere also explains the “greenhouse” effect. The Sun’s energy is mostly in visible light and passes through our atmosphere to the surface of the Earth where some of it is absorbed. The Earth is also “glowing”, radiating energy back out toward space, but because of the Earth’s cooler temperature the energy it radiates is in the infrared part of the spectrum rather than visible light. Water, carbon dioxide, methane and other minor components of our troposphere absorb the infrared radiation, intercepting that energy before it escapes to space and causing the Earth’s temperature to be higher. (illustration) (Some extra comments on chemical differentiation and balance of CO2 on Earth).

 One of the big clues to past climate change is found right here in our own back yard. Glacial Lake Agassiz once filled the Red River Valley. The presence of the lake was the consequence of a large glacier to the North that dammed the Red River. The evidence for the existence of Lake Agassiz includes the muddy lake sediments beneath us, the sandy beach lines on the East and West sides of the valley, and the strandlines on either side of the lake where the lake waves cut scarps into the shoreline. We will look at these on our field trip.

 Outside the valley, we find glacial till. Glacial till is the poorly sorted sediment which we find associated with modern glaciers. The topography outside the valley (the rolling hills that are poorly drained, with potholes, lakes, hills and depressions) are characteristic of a terrain shaped by large glaciers.

 We also find Striated Boulders in our region. These are rocks where the ice, with sand imbedded in it, scrapped over the rock like sandpaper. Again, these tell a story of a time when a glacier covered our region. (picture of striations)

 Cores taken into ancient glacial ice (such as in Antarctica or Greenland) also reveal past climate changes. Layers of ice build up year after year as snowfall in winter is layered with dust in summer. Samples taken from progressively deeper layers can be analyzed for isotopes of oxygen (which reveal average temperatures), carbon dioxide, and other components that tell us about the atmosphere and its behavior in the past. (illustration of past climate changes based on ice cores)

 Cores from sea bottom sediment can also reveal past climate change in a similar fashion. Both the types of fossils found, and the oxygen isotopic composition of them, reveal changes in global water temperature.

 Long-term changes in climate of particular regions can result from plate tectonic activity. Movements of plates can cause continents to move from tropical to polar areas or vice-versa. In addition, the movements of plates, formation of new mountain ranges or erosion of old ones changes the circulation patterns of air or ocean water which can drastically affect climate. Volcanic activity resulting from plate tectonics can influence climate by emitting CO2, which can cause greenhouse warming, dust, or sulfur compounds which can increase the reflectiveness of Earth’s atmosphere resulting in less sunlight reaching Earth.

 Shorter term variations in climate (such as the more geologically recent ice ages and warmer intervals between glacial advances), appear to be correlated to variations in Earth’s rotation and its orbit around the Sun. This is called the Milankovitch theory after the Serbian scientist who first observed and described the correlation. There are three variables in the Milankovitch model:

 The tilt of Earth’s axis 

This influences seasons as described in the section on space and planets. The tilt of Earth’s axis is constantly changing, going back to its original position about every 41000 years.

 The precession of the tilt

This influences at what point in Earth’s orbit around the Sun that each season occurs. Today, the Northern Hemisphere winter happens when Earth is closest to the Sun, but that has not always been the case. This returns to its original configuration about every 22000 years.

 The eccentricity of Earth’s orbit around the sun 

This affects how close to and far from the Sun that Earth gets each year as it orbits the Sun. This goes back to its original configuration about every 100000 years.

By considering each of these things changing with the others, it is possible to estimate how the amount of energy reaching earth has changed over the past 750000 years. The predicted changes in energy correspond to the observed changes in climate over that period of time.

 Variations in the Sun itself may cause changes in climate. We know that the Sun changes its energy emission on a 22-year cycle (the sunspot cycle). There may be longer-term variations in the Sun’s energy output as well. However, we do not understand the Sun well enough to accurately predict its past behavior or its future behavior. Maybe someday we will examine the “soils” on the Moon, where the absence of an atmosphere has allowed the Sun’s light to strike the surface unhindered for billions of years. The imprints of the solar wind in the minerals of the Moon’s surface may allow us to understand more about how the Sun has changed through time.

  

We hear lots of conflicting information about whether the Earth is warming or not, and what the consequences of a warming might be. The reason for this apparent conflict is that climate is an extremely complex result of many interacting components of our Earth’s system. Changing one part of that system can have unexpected consequences on another part. Even in the 1800’s, when scientists were first discovering that there was once a great Ice Age, scientist realized that an ice age might actually be the consequence of warmer temperatures. They reasoned that warmer air holds more water (see the section on rain!), so warmer air could result in more water, and thus more snow, in more northern latitudes, possibly resulting in formation of glaciers over many years. Following are some example feedback loops that might influence climate in unexpected ways.
 

Suppose that the atmosphere gets warmer.  What consequences will that have on the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere?  (think about plant growth and temperature)  (one answer)

Suppose that the warming atmosphere warms the oceans.  What consequences will that have on the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere?  (think about CO2 in your can of coke)  (one answer)

Suppose that warming atmosphere melts ice at the poles.  What consequences will that have on further climatic change?  (think about reflection and absorption)  (one answer)

 

 Future climate comments.
We don't know for sure what natural variations in climate we might expect in the future, although evaluation of past climate variations (such as shown in one of the figures above) might suggest we could go into another ice age.  Perhaps "global warming" is a good thing in that it is compensating for an otherwise cold slide into glaciation!  But the potential also exists for a "runaway" greenhouse effect, as seen in the example positive feedback loops above.  Scientists are working toward understanding of our climate in the typically methodical (plodding?) way of science.  This can be frustrating for policy makers who want concrete answers now.  The ambiguity and uncertainty of science as it explores a new thing, which are a part of the scientific process, can often confuse people about the purpose and nature of science.  But there are things we really do know.  The key to understanding science is identifying what we do know, and how we know it, and what we don't know, and how we might learn it.

 

 Field Trip:  Geological stories of regional climate change.
(This file will take about 8.4 minutes to load at 14.4K baud rate)

 

What causes the Seasons, learning activity (in MSword)

 
  Home Page (est.htm)     Previous Page (est4.html)

Image credits: The painting of the woolly mammoths is by C. R. Knight and is owned by the Chicago Museum of Natural History.